groo
06-18-2006, 02:53 PM
Every story in every religious text has many levels of meaning, particularly if you focus on fragments or passages out of context.
For example, some look on the story of Soddom and Gommorah as a warning against homosexuality, because some centuries ago, someone claimed that Biblical "know" referred to sex. Isn't it actually a story warning of the dangers of paranoia, suspicion, and failing to know and trust your neighbours?
Was Christ's death some miraculous salvation, or was it a warning and a reminder of the lengths the greedy and manipulative will go to when protecting the status quo and their slice of an undeserved pie? Who was hurt by the Christian message? The jews who followed? Or the "entitled" leadership who saw their steady stream of donations and sacrifices threatened if people kept waking up?
When Mohammed reminded the Muslims to "defend your faith", was he referring to butchering anyone who disagrees with your beliefs, or was he reminding people to study and learn so that they could calmly defend their beliefs when learning from others?
When Mohammed told the Muslims that persecution and even death for your beliefs was an honour, did he suggest that people commit ritual suicide? What of the passages where he specifically tells the Muslim people to make peace when an enemy offers, or to live in peace with the "people of the book" (Christians and Jews)?
Why is it that some insist on blaming the Jews for all the ails and woes of the world, when they simply have a self-supporting community that works together the same as the Buddhists and Hindus?
Another baffling spirituality issue I've run into lately is the disrespect for the faith of peoples who had no writing in their culture. Where is the fundamental flaw or lie in the Great Spirit, Mother Earth, or respecting that meat comes from taking or sacrificing the life of an animal? It seems a culture of gratitude and respect, not something to laugh at and denigrate because it doesn't follow Biblical homilies and text.
The Buddhists (and presumably Hindus) refer to the "Bodhi mind". In what way is that different from "soul" or "Holy Spirit" other than their choice to deny the existance of a universal intelligence or God?
Humans baffle me. All around the world, they preach variants on the same message from different texts and history, yet so many of them blindly condemn anyone and anything that disagrees. What difference between a psychotic mullah directing the young to die for his beliefs, and a vatican dictating what people should even be allowed to hear or see? "The Satanic Verses" or "The DaVinci Code" -- is either "evil", or does it highlight the fears of the respective clergy who have not taught and prepared their parishioners to think about their beliefs?
Cowards fear disagreement; the faithful learn and grow from it.
For example, some look on the story of Soddom and Gommorah as a warning against homosexuality, because some centuries ago, someone claimed that Biblical "know" referred to sex. Isn't it actually a story warning of the dangers of paranoia, suspicion, and failing to know and trust your neighbours?
Was Christ's death some miraculous salvation, or was it a warning and a reminder of the lengths the greedy and manipulative will go to when protecting the status quo and their slice of an undeserved pie? Who was hurt by the Christian message? The jews who followed? Or the "entitled" leadership who saw their steady stream of donations and sacrifices threatened if people kept waking up?
When Mohammed reminded the Muslims to "defend your faith", was he referring to butchering anyone who disagrees with your beliefs, or was he reminding people to study and learn so that they could calmly defend their beliefs when learning from others?
When Mohammed told the Muslims that persecution and even death for your beliefs was an honour, did he suggest that people commit ritual suicide? What of the passages where he specifically tells the Muslim people to make peace when an enemy offers, or to live in peace with the "people of the book" (Christians and Jews)?
Why is it that some insist on blaming the Jews for all the ails and woes of the world, when they simply have a self-supporting community that works together the same as the Buddhists and Hindus?
Another baffling spirituality issue I've run into lately is the disrespect for the faith of peoples who had no writing in their culture. Where is the fundamental flaw or lie in the Great Spirit, Mother Earth, or respecting that meat comes from taking or sacrificing the life of an animal? It seems a culture of gratitude and respect, not something to laugh at and denigrate because it doesn't follow Biblical homilies and text.
The Buddhists (and presumably Hindus) refer to the "Bodhi mind". In what way is that different from "soul" or "Holy Spirit" other than their choice to deny the existance of a universal intelligence or God?
Humans baffle me. All around the world, they preach variants on the same message from different texts and history, yet so many of them blindly condemn anyone and anything that disagrees. What difference between a psychotic mullah directing the young to die for his beliefs, and a vatican dictating what people should even be allowed to hear or see? "The Satanic Verses" or "The DaVinci Code" -- is either "evil", or does it highlight the fears of the respective clergy who have not taught and prepared their parishioners to think about their beliefs?
Cowards fear disagreement; the faithful learn and grow from it.