PDA

View Full Version : Multi-discipline pain clinic? Maybe someday...



groo
07-21-2006, 10:08 AM
I'd posted some info about my experiences with the Saskatoon Pain Clinic
http://www.treatingyourself.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=13725

The letter I received from the anaesthesiologist I saw at the SPC outlines the decision made by him, another anaesthesiologist, the SMA, and my primary care GP to not get involved with an MMAR application. Instead, they suggested that Saskatchewan needs a multi-disciplinary pain clinic.

Over the years I've seen about a half dozen GPs, a couple of neurologists, a psychologist, and the anaesthesiologist regarding the migraines, their treatment, and the MMAR paperwork. I've had a CAT scan, an MRI, and blood work done.

I've been through the long process of eliminating potential trigger foods, identifying a few key items that I avoid like the plague.

My migraine treatment history runs through every treatment option listed at http://www.migraines.org/ (MAGNUM), plus a few others.

While a multi-disciplinary pain clinic is an excellent idea for treating chronic pain sufferers in the province, all it would do is save time for other patients. I've seen every specialty branch of North American medicine that would be involved with such a clinic; it just took me three years to do so instead of one visit to a multi-disciplinary facility.

There is nothing in the MMAR paperwork to suggest a time limit on when you have to see the spectrum of specialists for a disorder before the treatment options are exhausted.

As far as I am aware, my having gone through all available treatment options and specialties without success means that medical cannabis now qualifies as a "last resort" treatment. I believe it is my constitutional right to have that treatment authorized without further interference or obstruction from the medical community.

I considered Section 56, but that is apparently for researchers, not patients. I'm not interested in returning to school for several years to obtain a doctorate so I can be a legal PhD researcher. That would be an absolutely ludicrous requirement for a patient.

Besides, even if I did obtain a PhD and become a medical cannabis researcher, that still would not be a personal prescription. I believe it would be illegal for me to write my own prescription in such a situation.

I guess the only remaining option is to prepare to file a self-representation case before the Saskatchewan courts demanding my right to effective treatment via medical cannabis under the Canadian constitution and/or Charter of Rights. If I file the case, it cannot be dropped by the crown as is so often done when a case nears a settlement that could set a precedent the crown wants to avoid setting.

coco_artist
07-21-2006, 11:50 AM
You go Groo...your fighting the good fight!:cool:

groo
07-21-2006, 12:05 PM
Any big project requires a project outline from which to build a detailed project plan... :)


Questions

Review Canadian Constitution, identify specific sections relevant
Review Canadian Charter of Rights, identify specific sections relevant

Case Outline Document (COD) for filing case

Outline follows logical proof/argument format, breaking down each key point to relevant subitems. Presumption is that successful argument of a sufficient number of points will win the case.
Copy-Paste portions of mailed witness statement, relevant TY whiteboard postings to support arguments.
Check for any legal document formatting requirements, adjust COD as appropriate

File with Saskatchewan court system

Obtain formal documentation requirements, forms
Determine cost of filing, obtain funds
Fill out forms
Package COD, witness statement, full migraine diagnosis and treatment history, related letters
File forms with COD as pre-planned procedings

Proceed with case

Prepare subpoenas to obtain supporting medical history documentation, test results, and doctors notes
Set up .org to assist with legal fees, requires non-profit registration
Post request-for-proposal for a law firm to upgrade the case to a class-action lawsuit
Enhance .org website with a petition supporting CAL
Maintain proceedings history on .org website, subject to potential court-imposed publication bans.

?
Profit: MMAR, potential precedence, enhanced education and support regarding MMAR, potential streamlining of MMAR process

groo
07-21-2006, 12:34 PM
Project Outline for US Customs Suit


Prepare for RFP

Review US Constitution, identify specific sections relevant
Review US Customs procedures, identify specific sections relevant

Case Outline Document (COD) for filing case

Outline follows logical proof/argument format, breaking down each key point to relevant subitems. Presumption is that successful argument of a sufficient number of points will win the case.
Copy-Paste portions of mailed witness statement, relevant TY whiteboard postings to support arguments.
Check for any legal document formatting requirements, adjust COD as appropriate

Package RFP

Presume formal document requirements of MMAR case apply
Package COD, witness statement, migraine history as medical defense appendix, reference MMAR case
Prepare 2-5 page summary for meeting with law firms
Make copies for distribution

Obtain Legal Counsel with Jurisdiction

Contact local law firms that have associates/affiliates with appropriate jurisdiction
Arrange meeting
Deliver RFP package at meeting, discuss summary, schedule followups as appropriate
Select counsel for proceedings
Further decision and process to be determined by selected primary legal counsel.

Optional

Prepare subpoenas to obtain supporting medical history documentation, test results, and doctors notes
Set up .org to assist with legal fees, requires non-profit registration
Post request-for-proposal for a law firm to upgrade the case to a class-action lawsuit
Enhance .org website with a petition supporting CAL
Maintain proceedings history on .org website, subject to potential court-imposed publication bans.

?
Goal: Return of medical equipment, recovery of direct expenses, recovery of damages, recovery of legal expenses and court costs, other as recommended by legal counsel

groo
07-21-2006, 12:35 PM
Pretty much the same as US Customs, but it might require yet another law firm to avoid potential conflict of interest. I'm not sure.