PDA

View Full Version : Canada: Judge Can't Order Jury To Convict, Supreme Court Rules



Binky
10-28-2006, 09:13 PM
JUDGE CAN'T ORDER JURY TO CONVICT, SUPREME COURT RULES

Judges can't usurp the role of jurors by instructing them to convict on overwhelming evidence, Canada's top court ruled yesterday in giving pot crusader Grant Krieger a new trial.

The Supreme Court of Canada unanimously voted to overturn Krieger's December 2003 trafficking conviction, saying jurors were entitled to vote with their conscience.

The court said Queen's Bench Justice Paul Chrumka erred when he told a Calgary jury they had no choice but to find Krieger guilty, after his defence of necessity was dismissed.

"The trial judge unfortunately deprived the jurors of the responsibility that was by law theirs alone," wrote Justice Morris Fish, in penning the Supreme court ruling.

Fish cited a proposition raised in an English case more than two centuries ago which said jurors can ignore the law if they can't bring themselves to convict.

"It is the duty of the judge, in all cases of general justice, to tell the jury how to do right, though they have it in their power to do wrong," Fish quoted from the English case.

Doing so "is a matter entirely between God and their own consciences."

UNANIMOUS VERDICT

In the Krieger case two jurors asked to be dismissed after telling Chrumka they couldn't abide by his instructions to convict.

The judge ordered them to do so and the jury eventually handed down a unanimous guilty verdict.

The Supreme Court's ruling was applauded by Krieger and his Calgary lawyer, John Hooker.

"Ultimately I want a trial by my peers, not by a judge," said Krieger, who used his Compassion Club to distribute marijuana to those, like himself, who needed it for medicinal purposes.

"That's the only way laws change, through the general conscience ( of citizens )," he said.

Hooker said the ruling goes to the heart of our democracy. "It really does reaffirm the right to a jury trial," Hooker said.

A new trial isn't expected until sometime next year.

Toronto Sun (CN ON)
Copyright: 2006, Canoe Limited Partnership.
Contact: editor@tor.sunpub.com
Website: http://torontosun.com/

Keith Fagin
10-29-2006, 08:31 AM
A new trial isn't expected until sometime next year.



Make that two trials. One in Alberta and one in Manitoba.
The question now is will there even be anymore activity in regards to the two trials? Time will tell.

For the record Grant wants both jury trials to go ahead next year.

Keith

Mamahawk6
10-29-2006, 08:36 AM
God Bless Grant and give him strength to overcome the battles ahead!

Stay Groovy

medpot
10-29-2006, 12:06 PM
Geez, I believe they speak about it in this topic too - but there wasn't any comments about it.

Top court overturns pot activist's conviction (http://www.treatingyourself.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=16774)

I'm happy for Grant, but his fight isn't over yet.

He will still have to fight this in court with a jury of 12 people.

Did you know that Alberta was the home of marijuana prohibition in Canada - and it still is?

It all started by the political actions of an Albertan woman who was a federal MP.

Her name: Emily Murphy, author of a book called "The Black Candle" - Click here (http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=the+black+candle+emily+murphy&meta=) to find out more.

Anyway, since most Conservatives are marijuana prohibitionists and that Alberta has the highest number of Conservative voters - including the Sun chain newspapers in Alberta (very prohibitionist), the odds that Grant has for finding a fair jury in Alberta are not as good as if he would be fighting this in a Quebec, Ontario or British Columbia court.

But, that's just my opinion.

Glad your'e back Binky! :)

Marc

sedative ocean
10-29-2006, 12:30 PM
This lovely person.....Emily Murphy aka Janey Canuk...
Is on our 50.00 dollar bill.
A racist and bigot......:(
Classic that we honour her.

peace
Donna

Keith Fagin
10-30-2006, 07:21 AM
Disgusting person that Emily Murphy!

I have to agree with Marc about Alberta. It has been a real up hill battle every step of the way. Add to all this and Calgary's Olympic Park has a statue of Emily Murphy too.

The local activist group is still very small even after over a year of Calgary 420's very public activities and thousands of dollars. Rallies are not at all well attended still. Financal support is even less. I know this for a fact as I have attended every pro cannabis rally in this city since 2004. The only other person that can say this is my wife Debbie. Debbie and I have organized (lots of time and efforts and grief) and financed (pretty much alone other then prize give away donations) the pro cannabis rallies since July 2005 to date. I personally believe it is the Alberta attitude more then my lack of ability to get people to support the pro cannabis movement in Alberta. Calgary 420 being the first public pro cannabis group in Calgary leads me to think this as well.

Frustrating and disheartening at times to say the least! Still Debbie and I will continue to spend our own money and keep working towards getting some kind of support from others to help in the fight.

If anywhere needs pro cannabis support Alberta does big time!

Keith

I should note that Marco and local hemp stores have been as supportive as they can afford to be. TY, Skunk Magazine, CC, and High Times have donated magazines for the 2006 GMM in Calgary.
Grant Krieger has been a guest speaker at some of the rallies.
Donna (Ty's SO) is very enthusiastic at the rallies she has been able to attend.