View Full Version : Liberals pass Resolution 117
slimshady
01-15-2012, 01:11 PM
The resolution to Legalize and Regulate Marijuana was passed at the Liberal Convention.
http://convention.liberal.ca/justice/117-legalize-and-regulate-marijuana/
hollowpoint
01-15-2012, 04:08 PM
considering they waited from 1970 when evidence proved cannibis was less
toxic than alcohol, and the senate agreed! at least its a move in the right direction .
I hope the move isn't reported by the red neck press as a desperation move by
a nearly defunct party with no hope of ever achieving it's goals. but i'm certain
harper will say "see those liberals want to give everyone crack and meth".
Clear Head C
01-15-2012, 06:21 PM
it's nice to see eye's opening, big exhale....:)
Grand Pa smurf
01-15-2012, 07:23 PM
I hope the move isn't reported by the red neck press as a desperation move by
a nearly defunct party with no hope of ever achieving it's goals.
Toobad that's exactly what it is.
Even the loser party's nxt loser leader Rae has said he won't support it.
Looks to me thier biggest interest is being a bunch of losers lol
Not like they haven't pissed away plenty of bigger oppertunities to just do it already in the last 10-15 years much less the last 40
Anyone buying this crap of this party is better than the other, no matter what party, or crap they spew to buy votes, is a victim like the rest of the livestock imo.
In the end no matter which is in power, they're gonna do nothing but screw you to get paid.
Burn em all down n it's a starting chance, till than it's horse shit n you have your choice of spoon colour. Oh yay! lol
benwire
01-15-2012, 08:32 PM
I think the Liberals and the NDP just switched platforms according to their new found status of each party lol:D
virtualgreen
01-16-2012, 03:12 PM
Hear, Hear!
Well whatever becomes of it, at least it seems like a step forward. Get it out of the dark corners and talk about it.
"The federal Conservatives wasted no time denouncing the move as proof of the Liberals’ “soft-on-crime” stance." LOL! Its only looked upon that way cause "Big Brother" says so. In fact there's probably more crime because of the way things are.
thestar.com/news/article/1115911--liberals-end-2012-convention-with-internal-changes-new-president-resolution-to-legalize-pot
Cultosaurus
01-16-2012, 11:49 PM
The report I like watching is the CBC.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/01/15/pol-liberal-convention-sunday.html
Whether you love or hate the CBC, the comments area is always lively. The prohibitionists get on an don't bother to use any fact based evidence, they name call cannabis users with the usual 'pothead' and 'stoner' comments. The conservatives have an arrogance problem that they think they'll rule for ever. And yes, as Hollowpoint suggested, many of them are saying that it's just a desperation move. However, on Rex Murphy's show on Sunday, the Liberal members who spoke do seem to take it quite seriously. So, here's hoping that it will spawn more controversy and get the government moving in a positive direction.
hollowpoint
01-17-2012, 03:47 PM
last year and received one reply, from the northern manitoba senator!
I referenced the science and then how we could not only save billions on
the justice side, but cut down on demand for our health services if folks
can legally use cannibus for medical reasons. then add in the profits from
taxing it's sale and you have a boost to our economy across the country.
yes I know canada is supposed to have a medical program but if anyone
thinks there are only 7000 people using cannibus for thier ailments, over the
first 10 years of our "legal" program, then you don't live here.
Doctors still refuse to sign applications for catagory one applicants, cancer
patients or anyone else. I know 4 cancer patients to date, two have died, and the dr's could care less how thier last months were expeinced. sounds like
crimes against humanity in my books.
the liberals need to put the weight on the scientific evidence of cannibus and
let the republicans led by heir harper tell more lies, or lump it in with heroin.
SteveG
01-18-2012, 10:08 AM
Toobad that's exactly what it is.
Even the loser party's nxt loser leader Rae has said he won't support it.
Looks to me thier biggest interest is being a bunch of losers lol
Not like they haven't pissed away plenty of bigger oppertunities to just do it already in the last 10-15 years much less the last 40
Anyone buying this crap of this party is better than the other, no matter what party, or crap they spew to buy votes, is a victim like the rest of the livestock imo.
In the end no matter which is in power, they're gonna do nothing but screw you to get paid.
Burn em all down n it's a starting chance, till than it's horse shit n you have your choice of spoon colour. Oh yay! lol
AMEN! It is not called "the opposition" for no reason (yes, I know the NDP are officially "the opposition") ... also, remember that Jack Layton was best buddies with Mark Emery, when they were at the bottom of the polls but as soon as he was popular he distances himself from the cannabis community.
chillzpls
01-20-2012, 06:37 AM
The report I like watching is the CBC.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/01/15/pol-liberal-convention-sunday.html
Whether you love or hate the CBC, the comments area is always lively. The prohibitionists get on an don't bother to use any fact based evidence, they name call cannabis users with the usual 'pothead' and 'stoner' comments. The conservatives have an arrogance problem that they think they'll rule for ever. And yes, as Hollowpoint suggested, many of them are saying that it's just a desperation move. However, on Rex Murphy's show on Sunday, the Liberal members who spoke do seem to take it quite seriously. So, here's hoping that it will spawn more controversy and get the government moving in a positive direction.
It should be noted that the cbc discussion area is pre moderated. They pick and choose what they let through and control the message accordingly, sometimes worse than others.
chillzpls
01-20-2012, 06:41 AM
Hear, Hear!
Well whatever becomes of it, at least it seems like a step forward. Get it out of the dark corners and talk about it.
"The federal Conservatives wasted no time denouncing the move as proof of the Liberals’ “soft-on-crime” stance." LOL! Its only looked upon that way cause "Big Brother" says so. In fact there's probably more crime because of the way things are.
Seeing as how when it's legalized it won't be a crime, they kind of dropped the ball on that one.
Regardless, even though it's illegal, the vast majority of the general population doesn't see it as a crime, putting the harper regime very clearly far out of touch.
virtualgreen
01-20-2012, 02:03 PM
Seeing as how when it's legalized it won't be a crime, they kind of dropped the ball on that one.
Regardless, even though it's illegal, the vast majority of the general population doesn't see it as a crime, putting the harper regime very clearly far out of touch.
Know what you mean when you say "the vast majority of the general population doesn't see it as a crime" Thats whats so messed up. Plus to mess things up even further, on one hand it is and on the other it isn't, at least in a read between the lines kinda way. Makes for a very confusing process. X amount means this, XX amount means that, If your document say bla bla then XX is ok, buy not X..... LOL The govs running around like a bunch of rats in a flood then passes its denial on to us by putting up a wall.
chillzpls
01-30-2012, 12:07 AM
I hear the NDP are playing "Me Too".
It'll be great to watch those morons playing off one another that way, trying to find something to disagree on, while the right coalition walks all over them.
paddyk
01-30-2012, 01:13 AM
Our only hope, unfortunately is for the NDP and Liberals to merge into one party. There really isn't that much difference between them, not enough to make it worth splitting the vote. If the right could do it then why not the left? I say unfortunately because I fear this will not happen in time to stop the total destruction of our country, if it not already too late that is!
Legalize it already
chillzpls
01-30-2012, 10:52 AM
I imagine they'll both be picking a "leader" sometime soon. As soon as they do they'll be targeted by propaganda and attack ads. The only reason we're not seeing them now is because they don't know who to go after.
If they don't form a coalition they stand no chance. I think the sooner they do it the better. But the fact that they don't seem to want to, and haven't yet, seems to me they're quite comfortable collecting their paychecks from the backseat.
It's def. too late.
chillzpls
01-30-2012, 12:04 PM
What I meant to say above was, given the globalization/ nwo agenda and how they intend to ram it down our throats, opposition has been.... conveniently incompetent. At this point it's fair to ask whether or not it's accidental.
Cultosaurus
02-01-2012, 11:48 AM
It should be noted that the cbc discussion area is pre moderated. They pick and choose what they let through and control the message accordingly, sometimes worse than others.
Oh, yeah. I know that. I see only about half my comments posted. And that's with me following all he rules. I had quite a discussion with one poster, she was allowed to say all kinds of things that are beyond the rules, and yet my polite rebuttal was not posted. And yet, the conservatives on there say it's a liberal CBC controlled media.
There are all kinds of NWO conspiracy theories that I never used to subscribe to, but I'm increasing beginning to believe them. We made such progress there for a while and now it's all going backwards faster than it ever went forward. There has to be some BS pressure pushing back. Logic, intelligence, medical and scientific data and the sense of proper ethics are being completely ignored now more than ever when we have more and more evidence and polls of support.
Maybe we need a conspiracy theories thread for some informational sites to look at. I look at this one occasionally, but I'm sure there are more and maybe better ones. http://www.knowthelies.com/ . The Codex, End of Nations, Monsanto, Depopulation, all kinds of stuff.
chillzpls
02-02-2012, 01:11 PM
Oh, yeah. I know that. I see only about half my comments posted. And that's with me following all he rules. I had quite a discussion with one poster, she was allowed to say all kinds of things that are beyond the rules, and yet my polite rebuttal was not posted. And yet, the conservatives on there say it's a liberal CBC controlled media.
There are all kinds of NWO conspiracy theories that I never used to subscribe to, but I'm increasing beginning to believe them. We made such progress there for a while and now it's all going backwards faster than it ever went forward. There has to be some BS pressure pushing back. Logic, intelligence, medical and scientific data and the sense of proper ethics are being completely ignored now more than ever when we have more and more evidence and polls of support.
Maybe we need a conspiracy theories thread for some informational sites to look at. I look at this one occasionally, but I'm sure there are more and maybe better ones. http://www.knowthelies.com/ . The Codex, End of Nations, Monsanto, Depopulation, all kinds of stuff.
It's never a question of "following the rules", it is one of controlling the message. But that is done on multiple fronts. You have censorship at CBC, picking and choosing what coexists with their manufactured consensus, and then you have the paid shills from the PM's office attempting to impose their own, more often then not they either parallel or run tangential to one another, but it doesn't stop them from complaining that it's too left wing.
Another pending form of control over the message will be fear and intimidation via e-spying .
Also interesting is how those same paid kooks that complain about how left wing cbc is, also complain that Sun Media, the right wing government arm's length propaganda division, is also too left wing. Just read their comment section sometime and you'd think it was left wing paradise based on their complants. They work to poison reality and sow ignorance and division, and they find no shame in going "full retard" to do it.
If you want to get a comment through on CBC though, all that it seems is required is to call them out on their bullshit censorship.
It goes a little like :
"Why are you censoring this dangerous Idea, cbc/comment follows"
Or "Of course CBC is going to censor this.../comment follows"
or "leading comment/ POST IT THIS TIME CBC, 4th try.... why are you censoring this?"
They'll attempt to "prove you wrong" and post it, nearly without fail.
"There are all kinds of NWO conspiracy theories that I never used to subscribe " Because you weren't informed? Because your government has your best interests in mind??? Corporations would never do such a thing??? At some point they are powerful enough that the thirst for more subsides???
Fuck man... the age of tinfoil hat retorts died a fuckin decade ago.
You can see the codex slapping you across the face in bill after bill after bill.
Alex Jones comes off as a bit of a quack at times, but I think he discredits himself with talk of lizard people interbreeding so that they don't suicide him. The fact is he's been one accurate and prescient sob.
http://www.infowars.com/ and prison planet seem to come up in discussion with some frequence.
chillzpls
02-02-2012, 03:10 PM
Well, "in the news today"
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/02/02/government-kenney-in-damage-control-mode-after-report-of-fake-sun-tv-citizenship-broadcast/
Those left wing bastards!!! How they lie!
That said, it kind of reminds me of similar stellar reporting by Sun propaganda corp.
Remember that story they spewed nation wide, where a supposed widowed mother was supposedly evicted from her own home after the city had it condemned?
Meh, I'll pick this up in my "rant" on the topic.
chillzpls
02-03-2012, 08:30 AM
And there it is:
http://www.treatingyourself.com/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=308061&postcount=8
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.