PDA

View Full Version : The Bayer Sativex counterattack on reformers



Binky
05-25-2005, 07:02 PM
Misleading US Advertisement - GW Response

If you are in the United States and are accessing this web page in response
to a US advertisement funded by Common Sense for Drug Policy, please note
that this advertisement is not endorsed by GW Pharmaceuticals. Indeed, GW
disputes and rejects the contents of the advertisement.

GW believes that this advertisement deliberately attempts to obscure the
clear distinction between Sativex® and crude herbal cannabis / marijuana.
The advertisement ignores the critical role of our unique formulations,
their delivery system and the rigorous requirements of the scientific
method. Such statements, in our opinion, deliberately seek to create
confusion, among members of the public and the medical profession,
concerning the nature of Sativex® and the goals of the company's program.

We are very disappointed that groups such as CSDP seek to exploit Sativex®
for their own ends. GW is a pharmaceutical company focused solely on
producing a medicine that can meet modern medical standards and serves the
needs of patients. We are aggrieved that participants in the marijuana
policy debate seek to use our information in an inappropriate and
unsupportable manner.

Q: What is GW's position on crude herbal cannabis?

A: GW has never endorsed or supported the idea of distributing or
legalizing crude herbal cannabis for medical use. In both our publications
and presentations, we have consistently maintained that crude herbal
cannabis can never meet the regulatory standards of the FDA and of other
countries around the world. We have also repeatedly stressed that these
regulatory processes provide important protections for patients, and we
believe that any cannabis-derived medicinal product must be subjected to,
and satisfy, such rigorous scrutiny.

Q: Why does GW believe that Sativex® is not just "liquid marijuana"?

A: Sativex® is not "liquid marijuana." Sativex® is a pharmaceutical product
standardized in composition, formulation, and dose, administered by means
of an appropriate alternative delivery system, which has been, and
continues to be, tested in properly controlled preclinical and clinical
studies. Crude herbal cannabis-often called "marijuana"-- in liquid or any
other form, is none of those things.

Q: What impact should the approval of Sativex® in Canada have on the
availability, for medical purposes, of crude herbal cannabis in the US and
elsewhere?

A: The approval of Sativex® in Canada does not mean that any other product
containing cannabis/marijuana should be made available as a prescription
medicine in the US or elsewhere, unless and until it has gone through the
same rigorous research, testing, and regulatory approval processes.
Clearly, crude herbal cannabis or marijuana does not meet these criteria.
We believe that other presentations of cannabis should not use Sativex® in
an attempt to bypass standard processes for making legitimate medicines
available.

Q: What type of cannabis-containing product should be made available to
patients for medical use?

A: Only a scientifically-based cannabis-derived product, which meets the
standards of modern pharmaceutical practice, and which has been approved by
the appropriate regulatory agencies, would be suitable for distribution to
patients as a prescription medicine.

http://www.gwpharm.com/news_press_releases.asp?id=/gwp/pressreleases/currentpress/2005-05-19/

coco_artist
05-25-2005, 07:10 PM
WTF and mj 'activists' are involved with this? wow
"GW has never endorsed or supported the idea of distributing or
legalizing crude herbal cannabis for medical use. "
I thought some people from Cannabis culture are involved in this enterprise? :confused: